In his retraction note last week, the journal’s editor-in-chief Martin van den Berg cited a litany of serious flaws. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read more at straitstimes.com.

In the past three years, Dr. Rian Djita and the ACSI research team have released multiple peer-reviewed studies and ...

Want to beat the winter blues? Preserve your inner peace through mindful movement, by integrating the ancient wisdom of yoga ...

The authors didn’t disclose financial compensation they received from Monsanto for their work on a ghostwritten paper about ...

British scientific journal Nature retracted a climate study due to data reliability issues, particularly problematic ...

In 2015, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer determined that glyphosate probably ...

Adult skeletal muscle is a tissue with a high capacity for regeneration due to the existence of stem cell population, termed ...

A scientific journal has retracted an often-cited paper asserting that the widely used weedkiller glyphosate doesn’t cause cancer, after revelations that the chemical’s manufacturer appeared to play a ...

The decision of Elsevier, a Dutch academic publishing company, to retract a safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans, is causing ...

Austin-based Natera is expanding its cancer detection capabilities with the $450 million acquisition of Colorado diagnostics ...

A new series in The Lancet led by a UC Berkeley professor equips policymakers and clinicians with a toolkit to break out of ...